← Full country profile
Country CSV

DEMOCRACYS.ORG / COUNTRY BRIEF

Croatia

Institutions and political conditions · 2025

72.6out of 100

#44of 179 places

−5.4points since 2015

66.6–80.1source-bound score area*

What the score says

Croatia scores 72.6 on the Democracys Standard. Its score was 78.0 in 2015, a fall of 5.4 points. The lowest-scoring dimension in 2025 is public participation (61.6).

What drove the change?

The score for Croatia fell 5.4 points, from 78.0 to 72.6 between 2015 and 2025. 1 of the five areas improved while 4 worsened, so the headline combines competing movements. Elections contributed the largest downward push in the score calculation.

This explains movement within the formula, not the causal effect of political events.

2024 context · Freedom House assessment

Legal pressure increased risks for journalism

Freedom House describes pressure through lawsuits against public participation and a law criminalizing leaks about police investigations. The democratic concern is whether reporting that scrutinizes officials becomes prohibitively risky. The presence of independent media does not by itself show that journalists can work without intimidation.

Read the country report · Freedom in the World 2025

AI-assisted source summary · not independently expert-reviewed

What this context does—and does not—explain

This is a selected development, not a complete political history. Its date may differ from the selected comparison period. It is not evidence that one event caused a particular number of points, and it may describe progress even when this index declines.

The scores use V-Dem. The narrative summarizes a separate assessment by Freedom House, whose definitions and coverage differ. Neither organization endorses this website. The summary is AI-assisted, source-linked, and has not received independent country-expert review. Source checked October 5, 2026.

Why democracy measures can disagree →

Look beneath the headline

Democracy test2025Since 2015
Free and fair elections68.6−13.0
Rights and checks on power87.1+1.3
Public participation61.6−6.7
Public reasoning69.7−7.1
Political equality77.5−0.8

Dimension movements are not additive contributions to the overall score. The method also accounts for weak areas.

Three questions worth investigating

  1. Can people shape public life through civic groups, direct voting, and meaningful local and regional government?
  2. Which documented changes in laws, institutions, or their implementation occurred during the period?
  3. What evidence challenges your explanation, and whose experience is missing?

Use primary records and country expertise. A change in an estimate alone does not identify its cause.

Read with care

This is an independent educational beta, not a V-Dem endorsement. Scores are not percentages of democracy or judgments about a people. Small differences may be within uncertainty. *The score area is obtained from source bounds; it is not a formal confidence interval for this composite or its change.

For an activity to use with this brief, open the classroom exercise. No sign-up or email required.