DEMOCRACYS.ORG / COUNTRY BRIEF
Sudan
Institutions and political conditions · 2025
#173of 179 places
−3.8points since 2015
7.1–16.4source-bound score area*
What the score says
Sudan scores 12.4 on the Democracys Standard. Its score was 16.2 in 2015, a fall of 3.8 points. The lowest-scoring dimension in 2025 is public reasoning (4.5).
What drove the change?
The score for Sudan fell 3.8 points, from 16.2 to 12.4 between 2015 and 2025. 1 of the five areas improved while 4 worsened, so the headline combines competing movements. Political equality contributed the largest upward push in the score calculation.
This explains movement within the formula, not the causal effect of political events.
2025 context · Freedom House assessment
Mass atrocities further undermined basic rights
Freedom House reports ethnically targeted killings, sexual violence, and forced displacement by the Rapid Support Forces after the capture of El-Fasher. These conditions destroy the security needed for independent civic and political life. They cannot be reduced to an ordinary fluctuation in electoral performance.
Read the country report · Freedom in the World 2026AI-assisted source summary · not independently expert-reviewed
What this context does—and does not—explain
This is a selected development, not a complete political history. Its date may differ from the selected comparison period. It is not evidence that one event caused a particular number of points, and it may describe progress even when this index declines.
The scores use V-Dem. The narrative summarizes a separate assessment by Freedom House, whose definitions and coverage differ. Neither organization endorses this website. The summary is AI-assisted, source-linked, and has not received independent country-expert review. Source checked October 5, 2026.
Why democracy measures can disagree →Look beneath the headline
| Democracy test | 2025 | Since 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Free and fair elections | 13.0 | −9.0 |
| Rights and checks on power | 9.0 | −4.9 |
| Public participation | 15.2 | −6.4 |
| Public reasoning | 4.5 | −8.2 |
| Political equality | 25.1 | +13.1 |
Dimension movements are not additive contributions to the overall score. The method also accounts for weak areas.
Three questions worth investigating
- Do leaders explain decisions, consult the public, answer opposing arguments, and consider the common good?
- Which documented changes in laws, institutions, or their implementation occurred during the period?
- What evidence challenges your explanation, and whose experience is missing?
Use primary records and country expertise. A change in an estimate alone does not identify its cause.
Read with care
This is an independent educational beta, not a V-Dem endorsement. Scores are not percentages of democracy or judgments about a people. Small differences may be within uncertainty. *The score area is obtained from source bounds; it is not a formal confidence interval for this composite or its change.