← Full country profile
Country CSV

DEMOCRACYS.ORG / COUNTRY BRIEF

Seychelles

Institutions and political conditions · 2025

73.1out of 100

#41of 179 places

+13.3points since 2015

69.0–78.7source-bound score area*

What the score says

Seychelles scores 73.1 on the Democracys Standard. Its score was 59.8 in 2015, a rise of 13.3 points. The lowest-scoring dimension in 2025 is public participation (32.0).

What drove the change?

The score for Seychelles rose 13.3 points, from 59.8 to 73.1 between 2015 and 2025. All five areas improved. Elections contributed the largest upward push in the score calculation.

This explains movement within the formula, not the causal effect of political events.

2025 context · Freedom House assessment

More competition broadened political participation

Freedom House links recent rotations of power and increased competition with greater participation and representation of women and different social groups. The change concerns who can enter public life, not only which party governs. Representation still needs to be assessed alongside the practical influence those groups can exercise.

Read the country report · Freedom in the World 2026

AI-assisted source summary · not independently expert-reviewed

What this context does—and does not—explain

This is a selected development, not a complete political history. Its date may differ from the selected comparison period. It is not evidence that one event caused a particular number of points, and it may describe progress even when this index declines.

The scores use V-Dem. The narrative summarizes a separate assessment by Freedom House, whose definitions and coverage differ. Neither organization endorses this website. The summary is AI-assisted, source-linked, and has not received independent country-expert review. Source checked October 5, 2026.

Why democracy measures can disagree →

Look beneath the headline

Democracy test2025Since 2015
Free and fair elections76.0+24.2
Rights and checks on power90.9+11.0
Public participation32.0+3.6
Public reasoning95.3+24.5
Political equality83.3+5.3

Dimension movements are not additive contributions to the overall score. The method also accounts for weak areas.

Three questions worth investigating

  1. Can people shape public life through civic groups, direct voting, and meaningful local and regional government?
  2. Which documented changes in laws, institutions, or their implementation occurred during the period?
  3. What evidence challenges your explanation, and whose experience is missing?

Use primary records and country expertise. A change in an estimate alone does not identify its cause.

Read with care

This is an independent educational beta, not a V-Dem endorsement. Scores are not percentages of democracy or judgments about a people. Small differences may be within uncertainty. *The score area is obtained from source bounds; it is not a formal confidence interval for this composite or its change.

For an activity to use with this brief, open the classroom exercise. No sign-up or email required.