← Full country profile
Country CSV

DEMOCRACYS.ORG / COUNTRY BRIEF

Palestine/West Bank

Institutions and political conditions · 2025

32.5out of 100

#137of 179 places

−11.5points since 2015

23.7–39.2source-bound score area*

What the score says

Palestine/West Bank scores 32.5 on the Democracys Standard. Its score was 44.0 in 2015, a fall of 11.5 points. The lowest-scoring dimension in 2025 is public reasoning (17.3).

What drove the change?

The score for Palestine/West Bank fell 11.5 points, from 44.0 to 32.5 between 2015 and 2025. All five areas declined. Public reasoning contributed the largest downward push in the score calculation.

This explains movement within the formula, not the causal effect of political events.

2025 context · Freedom House assessment

Military operations and displacement restricted civilian agency

Freedom House reports large-scale displacement from northern West Bank refugee camps, demolitions, and restrictions on movement during Israeli military operations. Authorities described the operations as counterterrorism measures. These conditions constrain everyday participation and rights; this territorial profile should not be conflated with conditions in Israel or Gaza.

Read the country report · Freedom in the World 2026

AI-assisted source summary · not independently expert-reviewed

What this context does—and does not—explain

This is a selected development, not a complete political history. Its date may differ from the selected comparison period. It is not evidence that one event caused a particular number of points, and it may describe progress even when this index declines.

The scores use V-Dem. The narrative summarizes a separate assessment by Freedom House, whose definitions and coverage differ. Neither organization endorses this website. The summary is AI-assisted, source-linked, and has not received independent country-expert review. Source checked October 5, 2026.

Why democracy measures can disagree →

Look beneath the headline

Democracy test2025Since 2015
Free and fair elections21.4−3.0
Rights and checks on power31.4−13.4
Public participation43.8−2.1
Public reasoning17.3−26.8
Political equality56.2−10.0

Dimension movements are not additive contributions to the overall score. The method also accounts for weak areas.

Three questions worth investigating

  1. Do leaders explain decisions, consult the public, answer opposing arguments, and consider the common good?
  2. Which documented changes in laws, institutions, or their implementation occurred during the period?
  3. What evidence challenges your explanation, and whose experience is missing?

Use primary records and country expertise. A change in an estimate alone does not identify its cause.

Read with care

This is an independent educational beta, not a V-Dem endorsement. Scores are not percentages of democracy or judgments about a people. Small differences may be within uncertainty. *The score area is obtained from source bounds; it is not a formal confidence interval for this composite or its change.

For an activity to use with this brief, open the classroom exercise. No sign-up or email required.