DEMOCRACYS.ORG / COUNTRY BRIEF
Latvia
Institutions and political conditions · 2025
#23of 179 places
−3.0points since 2015
77.0–86.8source-bound score area*
What the score says
Latvia scores 81.4 on the Democracys Standard. Its score was 84.4 in 2015, a fall of 3.0 points. The lowest-scoring dimension in 2025 is public participation (65.9).
What drove the change?
The score for Latvia fell 3.0 points, from 84.4 to 81.4 between 2015 and 2025. 2 of the five areas improved while 3 worsened, so the headline combines competing movements. Participation contributed the largest downward push in the score calculation.
This explains movement within the formula, not the causal effect of political events.
2024 context · Freedom House assessment
Legal recognition expanded for same-sex couples
A law allowing registration of same-sex partnerships took effect in July. This widened legal recognition for a group previously excluded from it. The democratic relevance is equal treatment under the law; it should not be confused with a change in the competitiveness of national elections.
Read the country report · Freedom in the World 2025AI-assisted source summary · not independently expert-reviewed
What this context does—and does not—explain
This is a selected development, not a complete political history. Its date may differ from the selected comparison period. It is not evidence that one event caused a particular number of points, and it may describe progress even when this index declines.
The scores use V-Dem. The narrative summarizes a separate assessment by Freedom House, whose definitions and coverage differ. Neither organization endorses this website. The summary is AI-assisted, source-linked, and has not received independent country-expert review. Source checked October 5, 2026.
Why democracy measures can disagree →Look beneath the headline
| Democracy test | 2025 | Since 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Free and fair elections | 83.4 | −0.4 |
| Rights and checks on power | 90.8 | +0.3 |
| Public participation | 65.9 | −9.5 |
| Public reasoning | 80.7 | −5.3 |
| Political equality | 87.3 | +0.5 |
Dimension movements are not additive contributions to the overall score. The method also accounts for weak areas.
Three questions worth investigating
- Can people shape public life through civic groups, direct voting, and meaningful local and regional government?
- Which documented changes in laws, institutions, or their implementation occurred during the period?
- What evidence challenges your explanation, and whose experience is missing?
Use primary records and country expertise. A change in an estimate alone does not identify its cause.
Read with care
This is an independent educational beta, not a V-Dem endorsement. Scores are not percentages of democracy or judgments about a people. Small differences may be within uncertainty. *The score area is obtained from source bounds; it is not a formal confidence interval for this composite or its change.