DEMOCRACYS.ORG / COUNTRY BRIEF
Equatorial Guinea
Institutions and political conditions · 2025
#169of 179 places
−2.1points since 2015
9.9–19.3source-bound score area*
What the score says
Equatorial Guinea scores 15.4 on the Democracys Standard. Its score was 17.5 in 2015, a fall of 2.1 points. The lowest-scoring dimension in 2025 is public participation (9.1).
What drove the change?
The score for Equatorial Guinea fell 2.1 points, from 17.5 to 15.4 between 2015 and 2025. 1 of the five areas improved while 4 worsened, so the headline combines competing movements. Participation contributed the largest downward push in the score calculation.
This explains movement within the formula, not the causal effect of political events.
2024 context · Freedom House assessment
Arrests increased the risks of public criticism
Freedom House describes arrests of activists who criticized the government or alleged abuse by officials. These cases matter for the ability to challenge state conduct and organize independently. The account concerns reported repression within a long-standing authoritarian system, rather than a normal alternation between freely competing parties.
Read the country report · Freedom in the World 2025AI-assisted source summary · not independently expert-reviewed
What this context does—and does not—explain
This is a selected development, not a complete political history. Its date may differ from the selected comparison period. It is not evidence that one event caused a particular number of points, and it may describe progress even when this index declines.
The scores use V-Dem. The narrative summarizes a separate assessment by Freedom House, whose definitions and coverage differ. Neither organization endorses this website. The summary is AI-assisted, source-linked, and has not received independent country-expert review. Source checked October 5, 2026.
Why democracy measures can disagree →Look beneath the headline
| Democracy test | 2025 | Since 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Free and fair elections | 17.2 | −0.6 |
| Rights and checks on power | 11.4 | −0.4 |
| Public participation | 9.1 | −5.1 |
| Public reasoning | 10.7 | −4.9 |
| Political equality | 32.9 | +2.2 |
Dimension movements are not additive contributions to the overall score. The method also accounts for weak areas.
Three questions worth investigating
- Can people shape public life through civic groups, direct voting, and meaningful local and regional government?
- Which documented changes in laws, institutions, or their implementation occurred during the period?
- What evidence challenges your explanation, and whose experience is missing?
Use primary records and country expertise. A change in an estimate alone does not identify its cause.
Read with care
This is an independent educational beta, not a V-Dem endorsement. Scores are not percentages of democracy or judgments about a people. Small differences may be within uncertainty. *The score area is obtained from source bounds; it is not a formal confidence interval for this composite or its change.