DEMOCRACYS.ORG / COUNTRY BRIEF
Cambodia
Institutions and political conditions · 2025
#164of 179 places
−9.2points since 2015
11.6–22.7source-bound score area*
What the score says
Cambodia scores 17.9 on the Democracys Standard. Its score was 27.1 in 2015, a fall of 9.2 points. The lowest-scoring dimension in 2025 is rights and checks on power (11.9).
What drove the change?
The score for Cambodia fell 9.2 points, from 27.1 to 17.9 between 2015 and 2025. All five areas declined. Rights and checks contributed the largest downward push in the score calculation.
This explains movement within the formula, not the causal effect of political events.
2025 context · Freedom House assessment
Independent media space contracted further
Freedom House reports that almost all independent media outlets had closed. The institutional effect is to reduce scrutiny and the availability of competing accounts of public affairs. A low or relatively stable score can therefore reflect persistent exclusion, rather than the absence of meaningful developments.
Read the country report · Freedom in the World 2026AI-assisted source summary · not independently expert-reviewed
What this context does—and does not—explain
This is a selected development, not a complete political history. Its date may differ from the selected comparison period. It is not evidence that one event caused a particular number of points, and it may describe progress even when this index declines.
The scores use V-Dem. The narrative summarizes a separate assessment by Freedom House, whose definitions and coverage differ. Neither organization endorses this website. The summary is AI-assisted, source-linked, and has not received independent country-expert review. Source checked October 5, 2026.
Why democracy measures can disagree →Look beneath the headline
| Democracy test | 2025 | Since 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Free and fair elections | 18.3 | −10.8 |
| Rights and checks on power | 11.9 | −12.7 |
| Public participation | 15.2 | −9.0 |
| Public reasoning | 22.0 | −11.9 |
| Political equality | 23.5 | −0.7 |
Dimension movements are not additive contributions to the overall score. The method also accounts for weak areas.
Three questions worth investigating
- Are basic freedoms protected, laws applied fairly, courts independent, and leaders prevented from abusing power?
- Which documented changes in laws, institutions, or their implementation occurred during the period?
- What evidence challenges your explanation, and whose experience is missing?
Use primary records and country expertise. A change in an estimate alone does not identify its cause.
Read with care
This is an independent educational beta, not a V-Dem endorsement. Scores are not percentages of democracy or judgments about a people. Small differences may be within uncertainty. *The score area is obtained from source bounds; it is not a formal confidence interval for this composite or its change.